City of Port St. Lucie header
File #: 2022-020    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Consent Status: Passed
File created: 12/22/2021 In control: City Council
On agenda: 1/10/2022 Final action: 1/10/2022
Title: Approve Amendment #5 to Contract #20200054 for the Construction of the Floresta Drive Improvement Project - Phase I.
Attachments: 1. 20200054-05-A5 signed, 2. 20200054-05 executed by all parties
Placement: Consent Agenda
Action Requested: Motion / Vote
title
Approve Amendment #5 to Contract #20200054 for the Construction of the Floresta Drive Improvement Project - Phase I.
body
Submitted By: Robyn Holder, CPPB, Procurement Management Department (PMD).

Strategic Plan Link: The City's Goal of high-quality infrastructure and facilities.

Summary Brief (Agreements/Contracts only)
1. Prepared by: Robyn Holder, CPPB (PMD).
2. Parties: City of Port St. Lucie and Felix Associates of Florida, Inc.
3. Purpose: To account for all field adjustments as well as holiday and weather impacts incurred through November 30, 2021.
4. New/Renewal/Modified: Modified.
5. Duration: An additional 59 calendar days are to be added to the project. The new proposed contract end date is March 6, 2022.
6. Benefits to Port St. Lucie: To facilitate the completion of the project without impeding ongoing construction activities.
7. Cost to Port St. Lucie (Annual and Potential): An additional $331,064.33 to be added to the contract resulting in the Contract amount being increased to $12,023,574.03.

Presentation Information: N/A.

Staff Recommendation: Move that the Council approve Amendment #5 to Contract #20200054 for the Floresta Drive Improvement Project - Phase I with Felix Associates of Florida, Inc.

Alternate Recommendations:
1. Move that the Council amend the recommendation and approve Amendment #5 to Contract #20200054.
2. Move that the Council not approve Amendment #5 to Contract #20200054 and provide staff with direction.

Background: Amendment No. 5 includes the items identified below:

Adjustment to AC Pipe Removal Costs - After construction work started, it was discovered that more asbestos-cement pipe had to be removed than was originally anticipated when Amendment #3 was prepared. The Contractor was able to complete the work more efficiently than projected under Amendment #3; thereby, the contractor offered a reduction in the originally agreed to unit cost. This...

Click here for full text